L'article va au-delà de ce simple bon sens, pour fouiller un peu la notion du bystander effect.
Ce qui est intéressant au-niveau de la rubrique.
Sinon, je peux faire comme tout le monde : Jardin - B-B-Q - Hillbilly music and beer
Et, épisodiquement, mettre un ou deux truc en vente dans les 'tites annonces.
People are much more likely to intervene if they feel some sort of group kinship with the victim, he also concludes. The problem is that in an increasingly fragmented modern society, people feel less and less part of the same social group.
C'est bien pourquoi j'ai pris le raccourci du 911.
"Most of us are good Samaritans trying to prevent violence," says Mr Levine. "When violence does happen it is the result of a failure of those norms of control, rather than something that people simply like to do."
Il est sympa, mais moi j'ai l'impression que ceux qui exercent la violence aveugle y prennent plaisir. Mais faut pas le dire c'est pas PC
Psychologists suggest three reasons. One is "audience inhibition", which makes us fear that taking action will be viewed negatively by the other people. The second is "social influence", which leads us to assume that if no-one else is helping, there is no need to do anything. And the third, most important, reason is "diffusion of responsibility", which encourages us to take the view that if no-one else is doing anything then why should we.
OK mais
He has discovered that in the great majority of cases people do step in and try to defuse violent situations.
"It's like choreography," he says. "It's as if they are following some sort of sequence. You can see how determined people are to fight and how much intervention there is by bystanders."
What marks his research out is that it is based on real violence, whereas previous studies have involved analysis of statistics and clinical experiments. What he found is that people within a group generally try to defuse violence, by making placatory gestures, such as putting an arm around the aggressor's shoulder, or getting between combatants or pulling them away.
Ou on se retrouve de nouveau avec le fait que l'on intervient quand on a des connexions avec la personne agressée.
Mais tous ceci est pour moi parfaitement théorique et même un peu cynique, dans un pays (L'Angleterre) ou la criminalité violente dépasse celle du reste de l'Europe, le recours à l'agression au couteau est monnaie courante, mais ou le simple péquin n'a légalement pas le droit de porter un égalisateur.
Alors c'est sympa de discourir sur le pourquoi du comment quelqu'un intervient pour stopper une agression, quand les chances sont relativement grande qu'il s'agissent d'une forme de suicide altruiste.
Bon là il fait chaud, c'est l'heure de la bière, j'ai qqs truc à mettre en vente chez ebay et je dois encore lancer le BBQ
Moleson